If I was trying to play something off, I wouldn't have written it in the first place. I am allowed to have an opinion. I did not say, anyone who likes 4th ed is [insert any derogatory comment here]. I simply said that the changes made from 3.5 to 4 did not work for me, hence my like of Pathfinder. I understand that you took offense to the way I worded that statement and it's apparent that you were already somehow frustrated when you read that comment and took what I was saying with way more weight than I intended it to be read with. I've played a few nights of encounters just recently and it isn't my cup of tea. For what it's worth, I apologize that my wording wasn't kinder. My personal opinion's will be left out and I will remove myself from this thread as I have no interest in getting into this with you or anyone else. I'm too old for this crap.Nacht wrote: Tolerance has zip-all nothing to do with this. It's a completely unnecessary and frankly, immature dig at something you don't personally like. You could have written it in any number of ways without saying 4e "destroyed" D&D, but you consciously did and immediately tried to play it off as nothing at all.
And lets face it... this disagreement has been going on since what 07-08?