Artifacts overpriced?
Posted: Sat Oct 16, 2010 1:15 pm
I got as a reward from the apprentice mage the ring of elemental fury!!! I had already seen such a ring in Angolwen, but could not afford it. So I was very happy, but I tried to really see what is the real advantage of such a ring and I arrived to the conclusion that it is insanely overpriced (or underpowered).
It increases most of your damages by 10%, gives 3 to cunning and costs 500gp.
The formula that gives the base damage of a spell is rather intricate, but, finally, it is more or less something like
a + (sp + ma)*b
where a is a small value (20-30 depending on the spells and the talent level), b depends on the spell and your talent level (and is approximately in the range 1-2.5), sp is the spell power and ma your magic stat.
I have a level 19 mage, with magic at 42 and sp at 81.
Now compare the effects of the elemental fury ring and of some increase in magic. You can find rings of magic +6 in Angolwen or in the dungeons (I has even seen up to +10). Gaining 6 in magic will give you +6 to spellpower. So, sp+ma will gain 12 (compared to 123) and your damage will approximately gain 10%.
This can be verified. For instance with this char and manathrust maxed, with a magic at 42 (and sp 81), the damage of manathrust is 249. By adding 6 to magic, the damage is 264.5, that is an increase of 10.2%.
The conclusion is that a ring of magic +6 is definitely better that the elemental fury as
- it also increases the effect of other spells (heal, sense, etc)
- it increases the base damage of spells and is is better if you have other damage enhancing items (I think that if you have an item that increases your damage by x% and another by y%, the final damage will be base * (1+x+y) and not base * (1+x)*(1+y) but I did not check in the source code)
- increasing magic increases your spell save (for this char form 53 to 56). Dunno how to compute the actual effect, but is is obviously slightly better.
You also have a small increase to spell crit from +3 in cunning of the ring of EF (for this char 14% to 15%), and on the average this gives a couple of extra % in damage, but IMHO it definitely does not justify the difference in price. A ring of magic+6 is around 25 or 30 and the ring of EF is not worth a price 20 times higher. And if you have the adequate ring and gems, it is also better to ask the creation of a +4 or +5 stat enhancing ring for 50-60 gp.
Maybe this analyse is not true for a low level char (but he surely cannot afford this ring!), for talents not maxed (but in general it is better to max some talents and to mostly use them) or for a high level char (but there are much better damage enhancing rings in the last dungeons).
I think there is a similar problem for the staff of destruction that can also be found in Anglowen. It is more useful that the ring of EF, but most staves of wizardry that you find in the last dungeons are better than it and are 10 times cheaper.
My opinion is that the price of these items should reduced (for instance at 150 gp) or their power increased (say 10% damage, 5 cunning, 5 magic for the ring).
It increases most of your damages by 10%, gives 3 to cunning and costs 500gp.
The formula that gives the base damage of a spell is rather intricate, but, finally, it is more or less something like
a + (sp + ma)*b
where a is a small value (20-30 depending on the spells and the talent level), b depends on the spell and your talent level (and is approximately in the range 1-2.5), sp is the spell power and ma your magic stat.
I have a level 19 mage, with magic at 42 and sp at 81.
Now compare the effects of the elemental fury ring and of some increase in magic. You can find rings of magic +6 in Angolwen or in the dungeons (I has even seen up to +10). Gaining 6 in magic will give you +6 to spellpower. So, sp+ma will gain 12 (compared to 123) and your damage will approximately gain 10%.
This can be verified. For instance with this char and manathrust maxed, with a magic at 42 (and sp 81), the damage of manathrust is 249. By adding 6 to magic, the damage is 264.5, that is an increase of 10.2%.
The conclusion is that a ring of magic +6 is definitely better that the elemental fury as
- it also increases the effect of other spells (heal, sense, etc)
- it increases the base damage of spells and is is better if you have other damage enhancing items (I think that if you have an item that increases your damage by x% and another by y%, the final damage will be base * (1+x+y) and not base * (1+x)*(1+y) but I did not check in the source code)
- increasing magic increases your spell save (for this char form 53 to 56). Dunno how to compute the actual effect, but is is obviously slightly better.
You also have a small increase to spell crit from +3 in cunning of the ring of EF (for this char 14% to 15%), and on the average this gives a couple of extra % in damage, but IMHO it definitely does not justify the difference in price. A ring of magic+6 is around 25 or 30 and the ring of EF is not worth a price 20 times higher. And if you have the adequate ring and gems, it is also better to ask the creation of a +4 or +5 stat enhancing ring for 50-60 gp.
Maybe this analyse is not true for a low level char (but he surely cannot afford this ring!), for talents not maxed (but in general it is better to max some talents and to mostly use them) or for a high level char (but there are much better damage enhancing rings in the last dungeons).
I think there is a similar problem for the staff of destruction that can also be found in Anglowen. It is more useful that the ring of EF, but most staves of wizardry that you find in the last dungeons are better than it and are 10 times cheaper.
My opinion is that the price of these items should reduced (for instance at 150 gp) or their power increased (say 10% damage, 5 cunning, 5 magic for the ring).