Adventurers. Jacks of all trades... except magic?
Posted: Fri Jun 20, 2014 1:50 am
Adventurer definition is jack of all trades, master of none. But they come up HUGELY short on any sort of magic build that uses mana. Vim builds go fine, positive/negative fine, etc. But the total and complete lack of natural mana regen forces them to either invest in one of the three trees that grant it, or grief a inscription slot with a crappy manasurge.
EVERY magic-user that uses mana has either natural regen (Alchemist, ARchmage, Necromancer), or has a tree exclusive to their class that doesn't synergize well outside of it which grants some form of mana regen. (Stone warden, Arcane Blade, Shadowblade)
It is hugely annoying to be either griefed out of a cat point and some talent points, or griefed out of an inscription slot, just because I want to run an archmage variant of adventurer. Nor is this the only build type to be penalized on this.
Please, PLEASE, give them some form of mana regen. In keeping with the 'not as good as real versions of a class' I'd suggest half the regen granted to the mage class-type. This doesn't unbalance them any more then they already are, and opens up a greater variety of build types, for more fun adventurers. Reasonable?
EVERY magic-user that uses mana has either natural regen (Alchemist, ARchmage, Necromancer), or has a tree exclusive to their class that doesn't synergize well outside of it which grants some form of mana regen. (Stone warden, Arcane Blade, Shadowblade)
It is hugely annoying to be either griefed out of a cat point and some talent points, or griefed out of an inscription slot, just because I want to run an archmage variant of adventurer. Nor is this the only build type to be penalized on this.
Please, PLEASE, give them some form of mana regen. In keeping with the 'not as good as real versions of a class' I'd suggest half the regen granted to the mage class-type. This doesn't unbalance them any more then they already are, and opens up a greater variety of build types, for more fun adventurers. Reasonable?