Page 1 of 1

ToME sig

Posted: Wed Jan 22, 2014 2:51 am
by Minion
Hi, newcomer to the game and thought I'd show off my ToME inspired forum sig. :P

Image

If anyone else wants one just let me know.

Re: ToME sig

Posted: Wed Jan 22, 2014 4:03 am
by Faeryan
Nice looking one, though I generally dislike signatures that take up more space than the post it comes with.
In long threads with big signatures they tend to use up quite a lot of pages.

Re: ToME sig

Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2014 2:43 pm
by Xandor Tik'Roth
While I really like the sig, we don't do images in signatures. Being a low-bandwidth forum sucks sometimes.

Re: ToME sig

Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2014 6:01 pm
by Minion
Xandor Tik'Roth wrote:Being a low-bandwidth forum sucks sometimes.
The sig isn't being hosted on your server.
Faeryan wrote:Nice looking one, though I generally dislike signatures that take up more space than the post it comes with.
In long threads with big signatures they tend to use up quite a lot of pages.
Understandable, which is why users are given the option to disable sigs in their individual forum preferences.

Re: ToME sig

Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2014 6:11 pm
by Grey
Xandor Tik'Roth wrote:While I really like the sig, we don't do images in signatures. Being a low-bandwidth forum sucks sometimes.
I thought we don't do signature images because signature images usually suck?

Re: ToME sig

Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2014 6:33 pm
by Faeryan
Grey wrote:
Xandor Tik'Roth wrote:While I really like the sig, we don't do images in signatures. Being a low-bandwidth forum sucks sometimes.
I thought we don't do signature images because signature images usually suck?
Think about it how even you could have a snazzy picturesque signature linking to your site.

Re: ToME sig

Posted: Sun Feb 09, 2014 6:13 pm
by Xandor Tik'Roth
Grey wrote:
Xandor Tik'Roth wrote:While I really like the sig, we don't do images in signatures. Being a low-bandwidth forum sucks sometimes.
I thought we don't do signature images because signature images usually suck?
We've never done sig images (or avatars, for that matter) in the 11 years that I've been here. We don't get a ton of server space and not everyone who comes here has an excellent internet connection. This is a simple forum, and images would start to clutter things up.

Re: ToME sig

Posted: Sun Feb 09, 2014 6:42 pm
by Doctornull
Xandor Tik'Roth wrote:We've never done sig images (or avatars, for that matter) in the 11 years that I've been here. We don't get a ton of server space and not everyone who comes here has an excellent internet connection. This is a simple forum, and images would start to clutter things up.
What, no way.

I just finished hand-painting my own awesome sig image.

Oh well, I'll post it anyway.

Re: ToME sig

Posted: Sun Feb 09, 2014 8:29 pm
by Grey
Doctornull wrote: I just finished hand-painting my own awesome sig image.
If a picture speaks a thousand words then that, sir, is a strongly worded essay listing all that is wrong with allowing picture sigs on forums!

Re: ToME sig

Posted: Sun Feb 09, 2014 9:25 pm
by Marson
Make me one. Now.

Re: ToME sig

Posted: Wed Feb 12, 2014 7:58 pm
by achoice
Xandor Tik'Roth wrote:While I really like the sig, we don't do images in signatures. Being a low-bandwidth forum sucks sometimes.
I for one prefer non sig. messages. Sigs. waste screen space - less is More.

Re: ToME sig

Posted: Fri Feb 14, 2014 8:59 pm
by Xandor Tik'Roth
That was the determination of the staff when we brought the question up. So yeah, no images in sigs, sadly.