[b20b] Confusion abuse

Where bugs go to lie down and rest

Moderator: Moderator

Post Reply
Message
Author
Grey
Loremaster
Posts: 3517
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2010 10:18 pm
Location: London, England
Contact:

[b20b] Confusion abuse

#1 Post by Grey »

If confused and next to an enemy you can keep tapping towards its direction without a turn passing *until* you get a lucky dice roll and attack in that direction.
http://www.gamesofgrey.com - My own T-Engine games!
Roguelike Radio - A podcast about roguelikes

Grey
Loremaster
Posts: 3517
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2010 10:18 pm
Location: London, England
Contact:

Re: [b20b] Confusion abuse

#2 Post by Grey »

Hmm, seems I'm wrong on this, it isn't abusable. Trying to keep on attacking will repeatedly do nothing until, at some point, it makes a random move (which may result in an attack). If in a corridor this brings your chance up to 50%. I think potentially what I was seeing was results of the random move where it hit the wall, thus not using a turn.

Perhaps there should be a feedback on hitting the wall, even if it doesn't use a turn? Something like "Oof, you bump into an obstacle!" (could be customised per zone - so wall/tree/etc instead of "obstacle")
http://www.gamesofgrey.com - My own T-Engine games!
Roguelike Radio - A podcast about roguelikes

Dervis
Wyrmic
Posts: 263
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2010 9:58 am

Re: [b20b] Confusion abuse

#3 Post by Dervis »

The issue here is that the game doesn't expend energy if you bump into a wall, so while confused you get that behaviour you described.
This doesn't look like an abused mechanic to me, however it would be pretty sweet if you didn't have to click multiple times when trying to move while confused and near walls.

Grey
Loremaster
Posts: 3517
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2010 10:18 pm
Location: London, England
Contact:

Re: [b20b] Confusion abuse

#4 Post by Grey »

I gues it would be better if instead of bumping into the wall the game recognised that one is confused and kept rerolling the direction till a real result was obtained. Or if from the outset of the roll it used only viable movement directions as potential outcomes.
http://www.gamesofgrey.com - My own T-Engine games!
Roguelike Radio - A podcast about roguelikes

madmonk
Reaper
Posts: 2257
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2007 12:21 am
Location: New Zealand

Re: [b20b] Confusion abuse

#5 Post by madmonk »

Grey wrote:I gues it would be better if instead of bumping into the wall the game recognised that one is confused and kept rerolling the direction till a real result was obtained. Or if from the outset of the roll it used only viable movement directions as potential outcomes.
I feel that a bump into the wall is a perfectly valid result...

So if you bump a wall, then a message ensues (about pushing a wall) and if their are any enemies about they get a turn too!
Regards

Jon.

ohioastro
Wyrmic
Posts: 202
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 4:32 am

Re: [b20b] Confusion abuse

#6 Post by ohioastro »

I'd suggest having "do I get to do anything" be decided before you try to do something. If the answer is "no", then you spin your wheels whatever key you press. Otherwise, you get to do something - whether that's actually useful or not is your call. Every new keystroke is a new decision.

Post Reply