Feather Wind Not Protecting

Where bugs go to lie down and rest

Moderator: Moderator

Post Reply
Message
Author
Dr Who
Wayist
Posts: 28
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 8:40 pm

Feather Wind Not Protecting

#1 Post by Dr Who »

I maxed Feather Wind to help my archmage defend himself against archers, but nothing seems to be happening. The description for Feather Wind says that my defense against projectiles is 67, but I do not see any change in the damage done in the stdout.txt file. Is there something here that I'm missing?

Code: Select all

[LOG]	Hill orc archer shoots!
USING	table: 095EDD08	Shoot
[SHOOT WITH]	yew longbow	dragonbone arrow
Total encumbrance	8.14
[COMBAT DAMAGE] power(2.050405) totstat(64.500000) talent_mod(1.000000)
[ATTACK] to 	Monin	 :: 	88.167430522796	18	35.687545912907	::	1
checkHit	42	15.75
=> chance to hit	95
[ATTACK] raw dam	88.167430522796	versus	35.687545912907	with APR	18
[ATTACK] after range	72
[PHYS CRIT %]	3
[ATTACK] after crit	72
[ATTACK] after mult	72
[PROJECTOR] starting dam	72
[PROJECTOR] after difficulty dam	72
[PROJECTOR] res	0	1	 on dam	72
[PROJECTOR] final dam	72
[LOG]	Hill orc archer hits Monin for #aaaaaa#72.00 physical damage#LAST#.
[SHOOT] speed	0.8	=>	800

darkgod
Master of Eyal
Posts: 10751
Joined: Wed Jul 24, 2002 9:26 pm
Location: Angolwen
Contact:

Re: Feather Wind Not Protecting

#2 Post by darkgod »

Defense reduces the chances of being hit, not the damage done (that's armor and the percitile resists)

However you log shows it did not affect your defense, I'll check it out thanks
[tome] joylove: You can't just release an expansion like one would release a Kraken XD
--
[tome] phantomfrettchen: your ability not to tease anyone is simply stunning ;)

Dr Who
Wayist
Posts: 28
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 8:40 pm

Re: Feather Wind Not Protecting

#3 Post by Dr Who »

On further testing, it seems that feather wind actually affected melee defense.

Before activating Feather Wind:

Code: Select all

[COMBAT DAMAGE] power(1.809969) totstat(60.000000) talent_mod(1.000000)
[ATTACK] to 	Monin	 :: 	72.398757751994	6	35.687545912907	::	1
checkHit	39	15.75
=> chance to hit	95
[ATTACK] raw dam	72.398757751994	versus	35.687545912907	with APR	6
[ATTACK] after range	55
[PHYS CRIT %]	7
[ATTACK] after crit	55
[ATTACK] after mult	55
[PROJECTOR] starting dam	55
[PROJECTOR] after difficulty dam	55
[PROJECTOR] res	0	1	 on dam	55
[PROJECTOR] final dam	55
[LOG]	Hill orc warrior hits Monin for #aaaaaa#55.00 physical damage#LAST#.
After activating Feather Wind:

Code: Select all

[LOG]	Monin activates Feather Wind.
[SOUND] loading from	/data/sound/talents/spell_generic2.wav	:=:	userdata: 1051E580
addTmpVal	max_encumber	131	 :=: 	0	1395
addTmpVal	combat_def_ranged	67.425	 :=: 	0	1396
addTmpVal	levitation	1	 :=: 	0	1397
Total encumbrance	196.3
removeTempVal	never_move	1	 :=: 	1393
delTmpVal	never_move	1
[LOG]	#00FF00#You are no longer encumbered.
[ATTACK] attacking with	mithril waraxe
[COMBAT DAMAGE] power(1.809969) totstat(60.000000) talent_mod(1.000000)
[ATTACK] to 	Monin	 :: 	72.398757751994	6	35.687545912907	::	1
checkHit	39	83.175
=> chance to hit	5
[LOG]	Hill orc warrior misses Monin.

darkgod
Master of Eyal
Posts: 10751
Joined: Wed Jul 24, 2002 9:26 pm
Location: Angolwen
Contact:

Re: Feather Wind Not Protecting

#4 Post by darkgod »

Ah yes!

Fixed
[tome] joylove: You can't just release an expansion like one would release a Kraken XD
--
[tome] phantomfrettchen: your ability not to tease anyone is simply stunning ;)

Dr Who
Wayist
Posts: 28
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 8:40 pm

Re: Feather Wind Not Protecting

#5 Post by Dr Who »

Fixed
Thank you! Archers were by far the most threatening thing to me. This should balance things out a bit.

darkgod
Master of Eyal
Posts: 10751
Joined: Wed Jul 24, 2002 9:26 pm
Location: Angolwen
Contact:

Re: Feather Wind Not Protecting

#6 Post by darkgod »

I also reduced the bonus, it was far too high :)
[tome] joylove: You can't just release an expansion like one would release a Kraken XD
--
[tome] phantomfrettchen: your ability not to tease anyone is simply stunning ;)

Post Reply