I'm not going to spoil it in case it is.
[svn] Is Bill's newfound lethality intentional?
Moderator: Moderator
[svn] Is Bill's newfound lethality intentional?
Namely, the absolutely incredibly nasty status effect he hit me with after a Rush? I was not expecting to see THAT four letter word at level 5.
I'm not going to spoil it in case it is.
I'm not going to spoil it in case it is.
Re: [svn] Is Bill's newfound lethality intentional?
?? Daze ?
He always did it, excet before daze was a full paralize so you skipped turns, now it's nasty but less so
He always did it, excet before daze was a full paralize so you skipped turns, now it's nasty but less so
[tome] joylove: You can't just release an expansion like one would release a Kraken XD
--
[tome] phantomfrettchen: your ability not to tease anyone is simply stunning
--
[tome] phantomfrettchen: your ability not to tease anyone is simply stunning
Re: [svn] Is Bill's newfound lethality intentional?
I always try to position there so he can't Rush me, thus removing the possibility of being dazed.
Re: [svn] Is Bill's newfound lethality intentional?
yeah rush has a minimal range
[tome] joylove: You can't just release an expansion like one would release a Kraken XD
--
[tome] phantomfrettchen: your ability not to tease anyone is simply stunning
--
[tome] phantomfrettchen: your ability not to tease anyone is simply stunning
Re: [svn] Is Bill's newfound lethality intentional?
What I like to do with Bill is to leave one troll alive and use him as a shield against rushing until Bill shuffles forward. He should be killing less people now anyway, since daze can be removed with a physical wild.
<darkgod> all this fine balancing talk is boring
<darkgod> brb buffing boulder throwers
<darkgod> brb buffing boulder throwers
Re: [svn] Is Bill's newfound lethality intentional?
:O OHdarkgod wrote:?? Daze ?
He always did it, excet before daze was a full paralize so you skipped turns, now it's nasty but less so
Well that would explain it. It just feels much more awful now that it's visible.
Thanks for the clarification, boss.
Re: [svn] Is Bill's newfound lethality intentional?
Wait, really? I must have missed something in svn.supermini wrote:What I like to do with Bill is to leave one troll alive and use him as a shield against rushing until Bill shuffles forward. He should be killing less people now anyway, since daze can be removed with a physical wild.
Sorry about all the parentheses (sometimes I like to clarify things).
Re: [svn] Is Bill's newfound lethality intentional?
Daze was changed from full turn loss to a status that halves your powers/saves/defense/damage% and prevents you from moving. Still breaks with damage.
So yeah, now you can remove it with physical Wilds.
(Of course, once in a blue moon you could before. If you hit full energy the exact turn you get Stunned, you had the chance. But that's beside the point.)
So yeah, now you can remove it with physical Wilds.
(Of course, once in a blue moon you could before. If you hit full energy the exact turn you get Stunned, you had the chance. But that's beside the point.)