Wiki... the Quicker Spoiler Upper!!! (-;
(impatient to write some Tomewiki)
Search found 7 matches
- Tue Jun 22, 2004 10:44 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: ToME Wiki wanted/needed?
- Replies: 104
- Views: 65696
- Tue Jun 22, 2004 7:48 am
- Forum: Ideas
- Topic: Random Uniques
- Replies: 5
- Views: 28763
randiques
It would add unpredictability to the game. (-;
- Sun Jun 20, 2004 4:00 pm
- Forum: Ideas
- Topic: The New and improved Sentience
- Replies: 25
- Views: 89733
*ID*
I was thinking of *ID*, not ID. There are rods for ID that are mundane, easy to make before you get auto-ID.
I haven't seen auto-*ID* anywhere.
I haven't seen auto-*ID* anywhere.
- Fri Jun 18, 2004 9:48 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: ToME Wiki wanted/needed?
- Replies: 104
- Views: 65696
The wiki we need
1. Authenticated user accounts Well, as authenticated as this forum anyway. Anyone can create 50 identities by using 50 free email addresses, but no one can use somebody else's! 2. ACLs on select pages What's ACLs? 3. Good support for reading and writing "thread mode" discussions on a Wiki...
- Fri Jun 18, 2004 7:44 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: ToME Wiki wanted/needed?
- Replies: 104
- Views: 65696
wiki? Wikipedia?
Could someone enlighten us on the difference between wiki, wikipedia, and whatever other alternatives may exist?
They all sound like a large improvement, but they aren't identical...
They all sound like a large improvement, but they aren't identical...
- Fri Jun 18, 2004 7:25 am
- Forum: Ideas
- Topic: The New and improved Sentience
- Replies: 25
- Views: 89733
selfish artefacts
>>>While i like the idea of 'selfish' artifacts doing things on their own, (does that consume a turn for the player, or is it in addition to the players moves?) almost all of your artifacts are WAY too powerful And they're very rare, very cursed, and have terrible drawbacks. >>>and some of them (lik...
- Thu Jun 17, 2004 6:44 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: ToME Wiki wanted/needed?
- Replies: 104
- Views: 65696
Wiki
I'm 100% for it, and would write for it. Advantages: ***anything that's factually incorrect anywhere can be corrected by those that know for sure(and code-dive as necessary). This is much better than the current "read 6 threads completely, and then keyword-search some more just to make sure the...